current issue web exclusives blog multimedia archive subscribe advertisers
Feature Articles
Editor's Note
Audubon View
Audubon in Action
Field Notes
Incite
Earth Almanac
Reviews
One Picture
Bookmark and Share

Field Notes
News Articles
Policy: Bracing for a Blow
Wildlife: Going to Bat for Bats
Interview: Bye-bye, Starlings
Marine Life: Trees of Life
Green Guru: E-Readers

Briefs
The 17-step solution; monkey love; get a goat, save a turtle.

 

Green Guru
Advice for the Eco-minded

How do e-readers stack up to books?
Julia Hollinger, Philadelphia, PA

Skinny and stylish, e-readers like the iPad and Kindle are the hip new way to read. But whether they’re more eco-friendly than traditional bound books isn’t as clear as their illuminated screens. Two e-reader life-cycle analyses have turned up contradictory results. “E-readers could have a major impact on improving the sustainability and environmental impact of the publishing industry, one of the world’s most polluting sectors,” concluded Cleantech, a market research firm that studied carbon created during the life of the devices. Yet when considering the use of fossil fuels, as well as water and minerals, a paper book has a much smaller effect, found author Daniel Goleman and Harvard lecturer Gregory Norris. For instance, a book made of recycled paper requires two-thirds of a pound of minerals (primarily gravel for road construction), whereas an e-reader uses 33 pounds for its electronic components and infrastructure. As a result, they conclude, e-reader owners would have to read 40 to 50 e-books to break even on most of the environmental costs. (The average e-reader owner buys 31 books a year.) For now your greenest bet is a loaner from the library.
Back to Top